<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TrackMeNot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.openbrainstem.net/peregrine/2006/09/15/trackmenot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.openbrainstem.net/peregrine/2006/09/15/trackmenot/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=trackmenot</link>
	<description>Stuff I Decided to Write</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 07:02:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peregrine</title>
		<link>http://blog.openbrainstem.net/peregrine/2006/09/15/trackmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Peregrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openbrainstem.net/peregrine/2006/09/15/trackmenot/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about that last quote in this post. If I had included more following the part of Bruce&#039;s post that I quoted, it would have made more sense there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about that last quote in this post. If I had included more following the part of Bruce&#8217;s post that I quoted, it would have made more sense there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Abilla</title>
		<link>http://blog.openbrainstem.net/peregrine/2006/09/15/trackmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Abilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openbrainstem.net/peregrine/2006/09/15/trackmenot/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Lamont,

Excellent points.  

I&#039;m not sure about your last quote.  In n-gram models and studies of entropy in computational linguistics, noise is actually very, very difficult to understand, sift through, and reduce.  

Adding noise works, but it doesn&#039;t eliminate the root cause of the problem -- yes, eventually search engines can still track you and perhaps identify you via your genuine searches.  This noise-making effort is distracting but, you&#039;re right, it doesn&#039;t solve the remaining underlying problem.  Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lamont,</p>
<p>Excellent points.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about your last quote.  In n-gram models and studies of entropy in computational linguistics, noise is actually very, very difficult to understand, sift through, and reduce.  </p>
<p>Adding noise works, but it doesn&#8217;t eliminate the root cause of the problem &#8212; yes, eventually search engines can still track you and perhaps identify you via your genuine searches.  This noise-making effort is distracting but, you&#8217;re right, it doesn&#8217;t solve the remaining underlying problem.  Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

